SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1371

JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Vipin Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :S.S. Narula, Advocate
For the Respondents: Ajay Gulati, D.A.G.

Jitendra Chauhan, J.

1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing of criminal complaint No. 512 titled as "Smt. Kusum Gupta v. Vipin Aggarwal and others" (Annexure P-1), summoning order dated 8.03.2008, passed by the JMIC Faridabad (Annexure P-2) and the order framing charge/charge-sheet dated 17.09.2008, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad (Annexure P-3), and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Brief facts of this case are that on 13.10.2005 S.I. Narayan Singh alongwith Constable Sanjay Kumar No. 111, driver Dharambir Singh No. 684 were on patrolling duty in a Govt. vehicle and were present near the Vatika when Smt. Kusum Gupta and Sh. Madan Pal Nagar, Advocate came present and Smt. Kusum Gupta gat her statement recorded which is as under "I am resident of above said address and I am in business of buying and selling of shares. My husband expired on 15th August 2003. I have one son Nitain aged 23 years and one daughter Neha aged 17 years. I was in business for nearly 2 months from 21.06.2005 in the office of Bonanza Portfolio opposite Bata Chowk, Sector 11. The owner of the office is Vipin Aggarwal, who


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top