SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 449

DARSHAN SINGH
Radha Bai – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Namit Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondents: Deepak Bura, Public Prosecutor

Darshan Singh, J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred by appellant-Radha Bai against the judgment of conviction dated 05.04.2004, vide which she was held guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under Section 18 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as 'Act') and the order of sentence dated 06.04.2004, vide which she was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of ` One lac, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 10.04.1999, PW-5 ASI Virender Singh along with other police employees was present at the inner gate of bus stand, Panipat in connection with patrolling. Appellant-Radha Bai was spotted coming out from inside the bus stand with a bag in her hand. On seeing the police party, she suddenly took a back turn and started walking briskly. She was apprehended on suspicion and was suspected carrying some substance in her bag. Thereafter, ASI Virender Singh served a notice under Section 50 of the Act upon her apprising her as to whether she wants her bag to be searched by a Mag
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top