SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 502

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Hemant Gupta, Lisa Gill, JJ.
Pardeep Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Narcotic Control Bureau, Chandigarh - Respondent
C.R.W.P. No. 665 of 2014
Decided On : 10-03-2015

Advocates:
For the Respondents: Manjri Nehru Kaul, Addl. A.G. and Vivek Saini, A.A.G.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Prohibition of Smoking in Jail - Cigarettes and Tobacco Products - Punjab Jail Manual, Prisons Act, 1894, Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement, Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 - Judicial Appraisal of Jail Punishments

Fact of the Case:

The convict submitted a representation complaining against the denial of parole to him, which was treated as a Criminal Writ Petition. The Court found that the punishment imposed upon the applicant may be a nullity due to the absence of prohibition regarding possession or consumption of cigarettes and biddies in the Punjab Jail Manual. The Court directed the State of Punjab to consider amending the manual to prohibit consumption of cigarettes and biddies in jail. The procedure for imposing punishments for offences in prisons was found to be violative of the rights of a convict, as it did not disclose a fair and transparent procedure. The Court directed the States of Punjab, Haryana, and UT, Chandigarh to file their respective responses.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that smoking in jail is prohibited under the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement, Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003. The Court also found that the procedure for imposing punishments for offences in prisons was violative of the rights of a convict, as it did not disclose a fair and transparent procedure. The Court directed the States of Punjab, Haryana, and UT, Chandigarh to file their respective responses.

Issues: The primary issue was whether smoking in jail is prohibited under the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement, Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003. Another issue was the fairness and transparency of the procedure for imposing punishments for offences in prisons.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that smoking in jail is prohibited under the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement, Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003. The Court also emphasized the need for a fair and transparent procedure for imposing punishments for offences in prisons, directing the States of Punjab, Haryana, and UT, Chandigarh to file their respective responses.

Final Decision: The present petition was disposed of with the Court's observations and directions regarding the prohibition of smoking in jail and the need for a fair and transparent procedure for imposing punishments for offences in prisons.

Hemant Gupta, J.

1. During the annual inspection of District Jail, Rupnagar, convict Pardeep Kumar son of Bahadur Singh resident of Village Kasol, undergoing sentence for an offence punishable under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, submitted a representation before the Administrative Judge complaining against the denial of parole to him. Such representation was ordered to be treated as a Criminal Writ Petition. Initially, this Court issued notice to the Union Territory, Chandigarh as well as the Narcotic Control Bureau, Chandigarh. However, later notice was ordered to be issued to the State of Punjab. On 04.07.2014, it was found that a humble beeri is the reason for denial of parole to convict Pardeep Kumar, but the Bench is unable to discern any provision in the Punjab jail Manual that a beeri is a prohibited article.

2. Thereafter, on 11.07.2014, an affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Superintendent, District Jail, Rupnagar, wherein it has been pointed out that as per para No. 540(2) of the Punjab Jail Manual, tobacco and all other substances except cigarettes and biddies are prohibited articles. It has been also pointed out that during visit of the District & Sessions Judge, Rupnagar on 27.07.2009, it was found that biddies and cigarettes were being sold in jail canteen prior to 13.07.2009. Such fact was also counter checked from the stock register maintained in the canteen. It was found that despite the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the biddies and cigarettes were being sold in the jail premises, therefore, the Jail Superintendent stopped the sale of biddies and cigarettes in jail canteen. However, the petitioner was caught possessing bundles of biddies & tobacco during a search inside jail premises on 08.10.2013. Thus, the Superintendent, Jail, ordered the punishment of 30 days separate confinement to the petitioner, as tobacco i.e. bundles of biddies is prohibited article in jail premises. Such order was placed for appraisal before the District & Sessions Judge, Rupnagar on 26.10.2013. It has been also pointed out that as per Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962, a convict can only be granted parole leave if he/she maintains good conduct inside the jail on continuous basis. Since the petitioner has broken the code of good conduct by keeping the prohibited articles i.e. bundles of beeris and tobacco in his possession, he would be eligible for release on parole after the expiry of one year from the date of commission of offence, as no parole/furlough leave could be granted to any such prisoner within this period.

3. However, after considering such affidavit, this Court found that in the absence of any prohibition regarding possession or consumption of cigarettes and biddies, as discernible from Clause 540 of Chapter XVII of the Punjab Jail Manual, punishment imposed upon the applicant, may be a nullity. The State of Punjab was called upon to consider; whether Clause 540 of Chapter XVII requires amendment to prohibit consumption of cigarettes and biddies etc. in jail. On 11.08.2014, it was found that Para 547 of Chapter XVIII of the Jail Manual provides that a prisoner, who has committed any of the offences enumerated in the preceding paragraph, shall be put up before the Deputy Superintendent by the Executive Officer In-Charge of the prisoner alongwith his history ticket in which the offence committed is recorded. The Deputy Superintendent shall hold a preliminary enquiry, record his own observations and present the prisoner alongwith his history ticket, witnesses and other relevant record before the Superintendent, who shall hold an enquiry and punish for such offences. The Court noticed the judgment of learned Single Bench of this Court in Shishpal Singh v. Superintendent District Jail, 1994 (3) RCR (Crl.) 516, wherein it has been held that punishment can be awarded only after examining the witnesses and giving an opportunity to the delinquent prisoner to cross-exa











































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top