SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 698

INDERJIT SINGH
Parveen Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Megh Raj – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Alka Sarin, Advocate

Inderjit Singh, J.:-

1. Parveen Kumari-appellant/defendant has filed this regular second appeal against Megh Raj-respondent/plaintiff challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 6.12.2014 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Moga, allowing the appeal filed by Megh Raj-plaintiff against the impugned judgment and decree dated 12.2.2014 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Moga, vide which the suit filed by the plaintiff has been partly decreed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Parveen Kumari-defendant being absolute owner of the suit house agreed to sell the same to the plaintiff vide agreement to sell dated 28.5.2004 for a sale consideration of `Three Lacs. A sum of ` Two Lacs were paid by the plaintiff to the defendant in the presence of marginal witnesses on 28.5.2004. The sale deed was agreed to be executed qua the house measuring 8 Marlas 2/4 Sarsai on 27.5.2005, but later on through separate endorsement, the date was mutually extended upto 27.11.2005. The plaintiff had always been ready and willing to perform his part of contract. When the date was extended to 27.11.2005, husband of the defendant was duly present. It is also the case of th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top