SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 636

RAJESH BINDAL
Durga Publicity Service – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Prateek Mahajan, Advocate
For the Respondents:Hari Om Verma, Advocate

Rajesh Bindal, J.:-

1. The petitioners-plaintiffs are before this court impugning the order dated 5.7.2013, passed by the learned court below, whereby the application filed by them seeking to amend the plaint, was dismissed.

2. It is a case in which the respondent-Corporation called tenders for contract of two foot over bridges-- (i) G.T. Road, near Bus Stand, Jalandhar and (ii) in front of APJ School, near Guru Nanak Mission Chowk, Jalandhar, vide public notice dated 7.9.2004. The petitioners submitted their tender on 17.9.2004, which was accepted. The agreement was signed on 19.1.2005. In terms thereof, the petitioners were to construct the aforesaid two foot over bridges at their own cost spending about ` 90,00,000/-, however, they had a right to display advertisements thereon for a period of 81 months. The construction of foot over bridges was on Built, Operate and Transfer (for short, 'BOT') basis. As there were certain objections regarding location of the bridge in front of APJ School, near Guru Nanak Mission Chowk, it was shifted to B.M.C. Chowk, Jalandhar. The construction was completed in the year 2008. Before expiry of the agreed period of 81 months, the respondent threaten








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top