SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 628

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Manjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurbachan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Parminder Singh-I, Advocate

Rameshwar Singh Malik, J.:-

1. Present application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Cr.P.C.' for short) seeking leave to appeal, is directed against the judgment of acquittal dated 2.5.2014 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bathinda, whereby complaint, filed by the present applicant-complainant, was dismissed and the accused-respondents were acquitted.

2. Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the learned trial court in para 1 of the impugned judgment, are that the applicant-Manjit Singh filed complaint against accused-respondents under Sections201/306/107/347 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC for short), on the allegations that complainant was residing at Bathinda alongwith his wife and children, separate from his mother namely Baljit Kaur, who was residing with younger brother of the complainant. Father of the complainant and accused namely Balwant Singh had retired from service as reader to the learned Sessions Judge, Bathinda. Father of the complainant showing farsightedness had partitioned his property among his sons i.e. the complainant and accused No. 1 on 21.06.2000, to avoid any bad blood among his sons at a later s































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top