SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 608

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Manoj Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Azad – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Chand Ram Olla, Advocate

Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.:-

CM-10069-CII-2013:

1. Prayer in this civil miscellaneous application is for condonation of delay of 63 days in filing the appeal.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the present civil miscellaneous application is allowed and the delay of 63 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

FAO-2119-2013:

3. Challenge in this appeal is to the award dated 30.8.2012, passed by learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon (for brevity, 'the Tribunal'), whereby a sum of Rs. 2,77,440/- (Rupees two lacs seventy-seven thousand four hundred and forty only) along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of claim petition till realization was awarded in favour of the appellant-claimant and respondent No. 3 was directed to pay the awarded amount to the claimant with a further rider that the insurance company could recover the awarded amount from respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (driver and owner of the offending vehicle) in accordance with law. Learned Tribunal further directed that 50% of the amount of compensation would be deposited for three years in the fixed deposit ac





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top