S.J.VAZIFDAR, G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Kapsons Electro Stampings – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise – Respondent
1. The instant appeal, filed under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short the 'Finance Act') read with Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, the 'Act'), is directed against the order dated 20.11.2014 (Annexure A-13), passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short, the 'Tribunal'). Vide the said order, the Tribunal has refused to interfere in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 31.01.2013 (Annexure A-10) wherein pre-deposit on the entire amount was ordered, during the pendency of the first appeal.
2. The questions of law that arises for consideration is as under:
"a) Whether in the light of amended Section 35F order to deposit entire amount of adjudicated service tax is justified?
b) Whether order passed by the ld. Tribunal is perverse and contrary to facts and circumstances of the case?
c) Whether the impugned order is justified when the appellant has strong prima facie case on merits?"
3. The reasoning given by the Tribunal was that the rent note executed by the appellant showed that the building, plant and machinery along with other infrastructure had been rented out and therefore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.