SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 859

JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Chiranji Lal – Appellant
Versus
Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Vikas Chatrath, Advocate
For the Respondents:Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate

Jitendra Chauhan, J.:-

1. The prayer in the present petition is for the release of the pensionary benefits for the service rendered by the petitioners with the previous employer i.e. Beas Construction Board (for short 'BCB) for the period from 1974 to 1986.

2. It is contended that the petitioners were appointed on work charge basis in BCB, however, the employee who were taken into other Corporations were granted the benefits of their earlier service but the service rendered by the petitioners in BCB is not being counted for annual increments and other pensionary benefits. The erstwhile HSEB was in need of skilled staff/workers and wrote a letter to BCB inviting candidates from BCB and approval was granted to take 16 persons on work charge basis. After an interview, the HSEB offered appointments on contract basis initially for one year with assurance that they would be absorbed in the respondent-Department. It is further asserted that the petitioner performed the duties at BCB on work charge basis, till their services were selected and appointed by the respondent and were issued appointment letters. The petitioners were granted extension till they were regularized in the year 1992. Wh











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top