KULDIP SINGH
Parminder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurdial Singh – Respondent
1. This judgment shall dispose of FAO No. 7534 of 2014, vide which the present appellant (respondent before the lower Court) has challenged the judgment dated 31.3.2014, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, vide which application of the respondent herein (petitioner before the lower Court) under Sections 50 and 52 of the Mental Health Act, 1987 (in short 'the Act') was allowed and respondent herein (petitioner before the lower Court) was appointed as a Guardian and Manager of the property of appellant after holding that the present appellant (respondent before the lower Court) is mentally ill person and incapable of taking care of himself as well as his property.
2. Dr. Gurdial Singh, respondent/petitioner, who happens to be the father of present appellant, had claimed in his application before the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, that he has got two sons and one daughter. His elder son Parminder Singh Chhina alias Peter Chhina (appellant in the present appeal) is suffering from the mental illness. It was stated that he was suffering from paranoid schizophernia. It was further averred that the present appellant/respondent had g
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.