SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1074

DARSHAN SINGH
Ashgar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mohammad Arshad, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Darshan Singh, J.(Oral):- The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) to quash the FIR no. 331 dated 04.09.2013, under Sections 363, 366-A, 376-D of Indian Penal Code and Section 4/14 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short ‘POCSO’ Act) 2012.

2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 03.09.2013, at about 05.30 p.m, prosecutrix-respondent no. 2 along with her sister-in-law (Bhabi) namely Asmina had gone to the fields and were cutting the grass. Suddenly, petitioner Ashgar along with co-accused Hakku @ Zakir, Javed, Farruk and one relative of Hakku @ Zakir came there. They gagged her mouth and put her in bolero vehicle. She was got alighted from the vehicle near the house of Hakku @ Zakir in millet fields. Hakku @ Zakir and his relative committed rape upon her many times and the prosecutrix was kept in millet fields for whole of the night. In the morning, they made her to sit in the vehicle of Sattar and she was dropped at her house. On the statement of the prosecutrix, the present case was registered.

3. Co-accused Farruk and Hakku @ Zakir were arrested. However, petit


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top