HARI PAL VERMA
Santosh – Appellant
Versus
Vinod – Respondent
Mr. Hari Pal Verma, J.:- The appellant-complainant, namely, Santosh has filed the present appeal challenging the judgment dated 21.10.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal whereby the respondent-accused have been acquitted of the charges levelled under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 328 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC.
2. Briefly stated, on the basis of complaint made by the complainant, a case FIR No.18 dated 8.5.2012 under Sections 323, 498-A, 406 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC was registered against the accused at Police Station Camp Palwal. As per the FIR, complainant Santosh was married with respondent-accused Vinod on 16.5.2011 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Sufficient dowry was given at the time of marriage, but still the accused used to tease her for bringing less dowry and they made a demand of Alto car. However, when the demand was not fulfilled, she was thrown out of her matrimonial home. On 7.5.2012, when the complainant was going to Rajiv Nagar from Palwal court, her husband Vinod came on a motorcycle along with some unknown person and forcibly took her to her in-laws place where she was given beatings and was threatened. On 8.5.2012 at aro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.