SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1060

HARI PAL VERMA
Santosh – Appellant
Versus
Vinod – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jangvir Singh Hooda, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Hari Pal Verma, J.:- The appellant-complainant, namely, Santosh has filed the present appeal challenging the judgment dated 21.10.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal whereby the respondent-accused have been acquitted of the charges levelled under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 328 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC.

2. Briefly stated, on the basis of complaint made by the complainant, a case FIR No.18 dated 8.5.2012 under Sections 323, 498-A, 406 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC was registered against the accused at Police Station Camp Palwal. As per the FIR, complainant Santosh was married with respondent-accused Vinod on 16.5.2011 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Sufficient dowry was given at the time of marriage, but still the accused used to tease her for bringing less dowry and they made a demand of Alto car. However, when the demand was not fulfilled, she was thrown out of her matrimonial home. On 7.5.2012, when the complainant was going to Rajiv Nagar from Palwal court, her husband Vinod came on a motorcycle along with some unknown person and forcibly took her to her in-laws place where she was given beatings and was threatened. On 8.5.2012 at aro

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top