SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1159

AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Saroop Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rattan Singh (dead) through LRs. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Augustine George Masih, J.: (Oral) -- CM-7081-C-2015

2. Prayer in this application is for condonation of delay of 52 days in refiling the appeal.

3. The reason for delay is stated to be the non-availability of the requisite amount to deposit the full Court fee and on the receipt of the same, the appeal was refiled, which has resulted in the delay of 52 days in refiling the appeal. The application is supported by an affidavit.

4. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 52 days in refiling the appeal, stands condoned.

CM-7082-C-2015

5. Prayer in this application is for making good the deficiency in Court fee.

6. In the application, it has been stated that inadvertently, less Court fee was affixed and on the Registry having pointed out the deficiency in not paying the required Court fee, requisite Court fee stamps were submitted/affixed and as of now, there is no deficiency in the Court fee. The application is supported by an affidavit.

7. The present application is, therefore, allowed. The deficient Court fee is permitted to be made good.

RSA-2927-2015

8. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgments and decree passed by the Courts below








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top