INDERJIT SINGH
Suresh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Mr. Inderjit Singh, J.: - Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.380 dated 21.09.2014 under Sections, 307, 325, 323, 506 and 34 IPC (Sections 307 and 325 IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak.
2. Notice of motion was issued and learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant appeared and contested the petition.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record.
4. From the record, I find that as per the allegations, injury No.1 on the person of Naveen was declared dangerous to life and is attributed to petitioner Suresh. The grievous injury No.3 has been attributed to petitioner Devender @ Bablu.
5. As both these petitioners Suresh and Devender @ Bablu have caused injuries dangerous to life and grievous respectively and they have actively participated in the commission of the offence and further the weapons are still be recovered, I do not find it a fit case where petitioners Suresh and Devenber @ Bablu are entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail.
6. As regarding petitioner Ashish, hi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.