SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1012

SHEKHER DHAWAN
Veena Tuli – Appellant
Versus
Ram Snehi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Y.S. Saini, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Shekher Dhawan, J.: - This Regular Second Appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 11.02.2014 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Chandigarh whereby the judgment and decree dated 22.11.2010 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Chandigarh was reversed in Civil Suit No.1 i.e. Civil Suit No.30 of 2006, titled as Smt. Veena Tuli Vs. Ram Snehi (Thekedar) and the appeal filed against Civil Suit No.2 i.e. Civil Suit No.502 of 2008, titled as Ram Snehi Vs. Smt. Veena Tuli was dismissed.

2. For convenience sake, hereinafter, reference to the parties is being made as per their status in the Civil Suit.

3. The detailed facts are already recapitulated in the judgments of the courts below and are not required to be reproduced. In brief, the facts relevant for disposal of this second appeal are to the effect that two separate Civil Suits were filed by the parties. The first Civil Suit No.30 of 2006 titled as Smt. Veena Tuli Vs. Ram Snehi (Thekedar) was filed for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 28.01.2005 and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the house bearing khasra No.73/55 in New Darshani Bagh, Mani

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top