SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1576

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Saleem – Appellant
Versus
Usman Gani – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.K. Vermani

Judgment

Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.

The petitioner-plaintiff in a suit for grant of damages and compensation on account of malicious prosecution launched against him by the respondent-defendants vide FIR No.47 of 2000 in Police Station Besau, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, which later resulted in his acquittal, tentative quantum of compensation for damages was mentioned as Rs.25.00 lacs. However, pending adjudication of the lower court, tentative court fee of Rs.500/- was affixed, undertaking to pay the remaining court fee as and when directed by the court. The trial court taking the tentative quantum of compensation for damages of Rs.25.00 lacs, as final, called upon the petitioner-plaintiff to deposit ad-valorem court fee on such amount and had called upon him to make the deficiency good in the court fees by 5.7.2014 vide its order of 30.5.2014. When court fee was not deposited by the stipulated date, i.e., 5.7.2014, vide order dated 18.7.2014, the plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Both these orders of 30.5.2014 and 18.7.2014 have been impugned in this revision petition.

2. No notice is being issued to the respondents-defendants as they were ex-parte even before the l






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top