SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1585

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
R. P. Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
R. K. Arora – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Aalok Jagga, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Savita Saxena, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J. - The respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 35,000/- along with interest thereon @ 12% per annum. In letters written to the plaintiff, he had acknowledged the factum of he being indebted to the petitioner-defendant for repayment of the loan.

2. During the course of evidence, one document (Annexure P-4) was put to the respondent-plaintiff but he denied the same. Sequelly, an application was moved by the applicant-defendant for obtaining specimen handwriting and signatures of the plaintiff so that a comparison could be made by the handwriting expert from the admitted or specimen signatures and writing of the respondent with the disputed signatures and writing on the document (Annexure P-4).

3. The court below making a bold assertion that there was no provision under the Civil Procedure Code whereby the civil court could pass any direction to a party to give specimen signature and handwriting declined the request of the petitioner-defendant on 12.5.2012. This order (Annexure P-8) is under challenge in this revision petition.

4. Perusal of the impugned order along with application of the petitioner-defendant and reply of the plain



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top