BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
R. P. Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
R. K. Arora – Respondent
Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J. - The respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 35,000/- along with interest thereon @ 12% per annum. In letters written to the plaintiff, he had acknowledged the factum of he being indebted to the petitioner-defendant for repayment of the loan.
2. During the course of evidence, one document (Annexure P-4) was put to the respondent-plaintiff but he denied the same. Sequelly, an application was moved by the applicant-defendant for obtaining specimen handwriting and signatures of the plaintiff so that a comparison could be made by the handwriting expert from the admitted or specimen signatures and writing of the respondent with the disputed signatures and writing on the document (Annexure P-4).
3. The court below making a bold assertion that there was no provision under the Civil Procedure Code whereby the civil court could pass any direction to a party to give specimen signature and handwriting declined the request of the petitioner-defendant on 12.5.2012. This order (Annexure P-8) is under challenge in this revision petition.
4. Perusal of the impugned order along with application of the petitioner-defendant and reply of the plain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.