SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1429

JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Karan Anand – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Bakshi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Jitendra Chauhan, J.

By filing the present petition, under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Cr.P.C.'), the applicant has assailed the order dated 27.07.2013, passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, dismissing the complaint and acquitting the accused of the charge framed against them under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (for short 'the Act').

2. It is contended that in discharge of his legally enforceable liability, the accused-respondent issued cheque No. 374233 dated 20.03.2009, amounting to Rs. 50,000/-, which was dishonoured with the remarks 'payment stopped by the drawer'. This fact was brought to the knowledge of the accused whereupon, the petitioner was asked to present the cheque again in the month of August, 2009. On 21.08.2009, the cheque in question was again presented which was dishonoured on 22.08.2009 with the remarks, 'payment has been stopped by the drawer'. A legal notice dated 02.09.2009 was issued to the accused to which he never replied. It is further submitted that despite the fact that the learned trial Court returned a categorical finding to the effect that the cheque in question





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top