DARSHAN SINGH
Samarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Darshan Singh, J.
This judgment shall dispose of both the afore-captioned appeals as both of them have arisen out of the same FIR pertaining to the same occurrence, even though challan was presented separately and trial too was conducted separately.
2. Cri. Appeal No. 2196-SB of 2003 pertains to Sessions Case No. 48 of 6.9.2000 whereby vide judgment dated 27.9.2003 both the appellants, viz., Samarjit Singh and Vinod Kumar have been held guilty, convicted and sentenced as under :-
Samarjit Singh
Under Section
Punishment
Default clause
307 IPC
RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-
To undergo further RI for two months
489-C IPC
RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-
To undergo further RI for two months
Vinod Kumar
Under Section
Punishment
Default clause
307/34 IPC
RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-
To undergo further RI for two months
489-C IPC
RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-
To undergo further RI for two months
3. Cri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.