SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1416

DARSHAN SINGH
Samarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Tanu Bedi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Jashandeep Singh, Assistant AG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

Darshan Singh, J.

This judgment shall dispose of both the afore-captioned appeals as both of them have arisen out of the same FIR pertaining to the same occurrence, even though challan was presented separately and trial too was conducted separately.

2. Cri. Appeal No. 2196-SB of 2003 pertains to Sessions Case No. 48 of 6.9.2000 whereby vide judgment dated 27.9.2003 both the appellants, viz., Samarjit Singh and Vinod Kumar have been held guilty, convicted and sentenced as under :-

Samarjit Singh

Under Section

Punishment

Default clause

307 IPC

RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-

To undergo further RI for two months

489-C IPC

RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-

To undergo further RI for two months

Vinod Kumar

Under Section

Punishment

Default clause

307/34 IPC

RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-

To undergo further RI for two months

489-C IPC

RI for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-

To undergo further RI for two months

3. Cri



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top