SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1622

ANITA CHAUDHRY
Om Parkash Syngal – Appellant
Versus
Shimla Garg – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Anita Chaudhry, J.: (Oral) - The petitioners have been arrayed as respondents in a complaint filed by Shimla Garg under the Domestic Violence Act. They have been summoned in the complaint case. Two petitions have been filed for quashing of the Complaint No. 208 dated 07.05.2012.

2. Both the petitions are being disposed of by this order as they arise out of the same complaint. It is necessary to mention here that Om Parkash Syngal - petitioner No. 1 in CRM No. M-24058 of 2014 had died during the pendency of the petition.

3. The facts may now be exposited. Shimla Garg was married to Sham Lal Garg in 1962. They had one son and four daughters. Arun Garg son of Shimla Garg was prosecuted for dowry death of his wife. Sham Lal and Shimla Garg were also arrayed as an accused but they were acquitted. All was well between Shimla and Sham Lal till 2001. All their children had got married by 1996. Sham Lal Garg retired from Government service in November 1996 and is a pensioner. Sham Lal and his wife Shimla were residing in the ground floor of the house. Their son and his family were residing on the first floor. The family moved to a house in Model Gram, Ludhiana.

4. On conviction























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top