Mrs. Anita Chaudhry, J.: - Rajinder Kaur and others have preferred the petition CRM-M-22699-2014 for quashing the order dated 13.03.2014 (Annuxre P-21), vide which the petitioners have been summoned to face trial under Section 302/120-B/148/149 IPC. During the pendency of the petition, petitioner no.3 Atma Singh has died.

2. Balbir Singh has preferred CRR-3636-2014. He is aggrieved with the order dated 18.09.2014, vide which the trial Court had discharged some of the accused who were named by him. The Court had ordered framing of charge against Rajinder Kaur and Paramjit Singh under Sections 302/34 IPC.

3. Since both the matter arise out of the same FIR, I propose to deal with them together.

4. Giving a brief narrative first, petitioner no.1 Rajinder Kaur is the sister of Balbir Singh complainant. Paramjit is the husband of petitioner no.1. Atma Singh (since deceased) who was named as an accused, was the father-in-law of Rajinder Kaur. Jarnail Singh is the real uncle of the complainant and petitioner no.1.

5. Jeet Kaur, mother of the complainant and petitioner no.1 owned some land in village Nangal Kalan. She was living with Rajinder Kaur for a number of years. A registered