SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 188

DARSHAN SINGH
Asrfi – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, for petitioner
Mr. Som Nath Saini, for respondents No.1 to 8

JUDGMENT :

Darshan Singh, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 21.05.2014 passed by learned District Judge, Gurgaon, vide which the trial court has been directed to decide the objections to the report of the Local Commission after hearing both the parties by passing a detailed reasoned order.

2. Decree-holder/respondent Ram Lal (now deceased) filed the suit for possession by way of partition on the ground that he is owner in possession to the extent of 1/4th share in the plot bearing Khewat No.935, Khatoni No.1188, Rectangle/Khasra No.312(2-7) situated within the abadi of village Jharsa. The petitioner-defendant contested the suit, however, the learned trial court passed the preliminary decree for partition vide judgment and decree dated 17.08.2006 declaring the DH-respondent to be owner of the suit property to the extent of 1/4th share. The appeal filed against the said judgment and decree was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon on 31.01.2007. Thereafter, the DH-respondent moved an application for passing the final decree of partition. The appellant-respondent did not appear in response to the notice issued on that applic












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top