SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1749

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
[DIVISION BENCH]
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta
The Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg
CRA-D-405-DB of 2011 (O&M)
Jaswinder Singh @ Jassi @ Bura
v.
State of Punjab
{Decided on 15/12/2015}

Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. H.S.Dhindsa, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Ms. Manjari Nehru Kaul, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302--Murder--Identification of Deceased--Non conducting of DNA Test--Held; even if DNA test had been conducted evidence would have been corroborative in nature only--Of course, doctor has stated that without DNA report, identity of skeletonize body and with facial feature was unidentifiable, identity of dead body cannot be established; yet with the clothes, ring and belt worn by the dead body, the wife of deceased could well identify the dead body--Conviction upheld.

       (B) Evidence Act, 1872--DNA Test--Such evidence cannot be said to be conclusive in nature and is corroborative in nature only. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Raj Rahul Garg, J.: - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 12.02.2011 rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby, appellant-accused Jaswinder Singh @ Jassi @ Bura, was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’). Vide order of sentence of even date, he was sentenced to undergo RI for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- with default clause.

2. Brief facts of the prosecution case is like this: that on the statement (Ex.PA) of Simarjit Kaur, this case was registered. She stated before the police that she is a teacher. On 28.01.2007, at about 12:00 noon, appellant-Jaswinder Singh took Avtar Singh (deceased) from her house saying that he had some work at Police Station Tanda. Both of them left on a scooter. During the intervening night of 28/29-01-2007, when she was asleep in her house, her husband Avtar Singh came home and left the house by saying that he was going with Jaswinder Singh on account of some urgent work. On 30.01.2007, Jaswinder Singh (accused) came back to her house. On the asking of complainant, Jaswinder Singh told her that under the influence of heavy liquor, he and Avtar Singh were separated in the morning. Complainant searched for her husband for a few days but could not trace him out. On 06.02.2007, she made report (Ex.DA) to the police of Police Station Bullowal regarding missing of her husband.

3. On 15.02.2007, Kamaljit Singh, who is complainant’s bhuaa son, received a phone call on his mobile phone from mobile phone No. 98157-25243. The caller told him that the missing located from Ludhiana within 1 or 2 days. He further asked Kamaljit Singh to contact on telephone number 98155-74327. Kamaljit Singh made a telephonic call from land line telephone number 240269 to the aforesaid number. Somebody impersonating himself as Avtar Singh said that they had come to pay obeisance at Nikiwala Lela. Kamaljit Singh, replied that they are coming. Thereafter, the aforesaid caller told that they were coming to him within 1 to 1½ hours. After waiting for long when Kamaljit Singh again made telephonic call about 3:00/4:00 P.M. on the aforesaid mobile phone, the abovesaid caller attended the call and made inquiry about missing Avtar Singh. This aforesaid caller backed out from his previous talk and handed over the mobile to somebody who told Kamaljit Singh that he had made a call on wrong number. Thereafter, the aforesaid caller asked him that he does not know him and then disconnecting the mobile phone. Under these circumstances, Kamaljit Singh, complainant and his relatives were confident that Jaswinder Singh in connivance with Balwinder Singh and his other friends kidnapped her husband and confined him at some place with an intention to kill him. Prayer for tracing of her husband was made. On the basis of this statement of Simarjit Kaur, formal FIR was registered as Ex.PN/1 under Sections 364,365,344/34 IPC. Statements of witnesses were recorded. On the next day, supplementary statement of Simarjit Kaur was recorded regarding illicit relations of Avtar Singh (deceased) with the mother of accused-Jaswinder Singh. On 28.02.207, SI Sukhpal Singh, received secret information regarding presence of accused Jaswinder Singh at Bus-Stand, Bhunga. Investigating Officer along with police officials had gone over there and arrested the accused. During interrogation, accused suffered disclosure statement on 29.01.2007 to the effect that he alongwith his friends Taranjit Singh, son of Jamal Singh, R/o Bhulana, committed murder of Avtar Singh and, thereafter, they both buried the dead body underneath of Eucalyptus trees in the field near village and he only knows about that and could get the same recovered by giving nishandehi. This disclosure statement is Ex.PO. Accused put his signatures on this disclosure statement besides signing of the same by the witnesses. Accused was put in lock-up. Finger Print Expert, Government photog

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top