SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1715

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Ramphal – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mr. C.B. Kaushik, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, J.: - Defendants are in second appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below in a suit for declaration and mandatory injunction as consequential relief.

2. Plaintiffs filed suit seeking decree for declaration to the effect that defendants have no right, title or interest in the land measuring 1 Kanal 7 Marlas be passed besides declaring gift deeds in favour of defendants No.1 to 9 not binding upon the plaintiffs and other inhabitants and the same be declared as null and void. Mandatory injunction has also been sought for removal of encroachment by the defendants.

3. Plaintiffs alleged that in the year 1993, defendant No.10 was the Sarpanch. In a scheme promulgated by State of Hayana to provide plot to homeless and landless persons, plots were given to those persons who were not eligible. The plots were given to defendants No.1 to 9, who are near relatives of defendant No.10 by misusing the policy of the Government. Gift deeds were made in favour of the defendants No.1 to 9 and others. The land meant for Kohlu was given by way of gift deed and the defendants raised construction over the site of Kohlu which was meant for i































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top