Mrs. Anita Chaudhry, J.: - The petitioners are aggrieved with the order dated 06.06.2014, passed by the Sessions Judge, Rupnagar who allowed the revision filed by the complainant and directed the Magistrate to reconsider the case.

2. An occurrence took place on 19.02.2011. The complaint had been given by Karnail Singh. The petitioners were challaned under Sections 323, 325, 506, 34 IPC. An application was filed by the complainant for framing charge under Section 307 IPC. The trial Magistrate framed the charges under Sections 323, 325, 506, 34 IPC and dismissed the application filed by the complainant. Aggrieved with the order, the complainant preferred a revision petition on 30.10.2013 but later withdrew the same on 17.12.2013 without seeking any permission to file a fresh revision. Thereafter, he filed another revision which has been allowed by the Sessions Judge. The order passed by the trial Court was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the trial Court for reconsideration, in view of the observations made by it.

3. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners have filed this revision assailing the order on the ground that the second revision was not maintainable and