SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 458

HARI PAL VERMA
Rajinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Gurdas Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. PKS Phoolka, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Hari Pal Verma, J.: (Oral) - Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 CrPC is for quashing of order dated 5.8.2014 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bathinda, whereby in a complaint filed by the petitioner under Sections 323/324/34 IPC (Section 325 IPC added later on), learned Magistrate has declined the prayer to summon respondents no.2 and 4 and ordered summoning of respondents no.1 and 3 for offence under Sections 323/34 IPC only. Challenge has also been laid to order dated 18.9.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda, whereby revision petition filed by the petitioner against order dated 5.8.2014 has been dismissed.

2. As per the complaint made by the complainant, there was a joint land in the names of husband of the complainant and the accused. After retirement, her husband demanded the possession of the land. Thereafter, a compromise was effected between the parties. However, on 25.5.2010, when Dharam Singh came to take the handle of the peter engine from their house, they asked him to take from the house of the accused and thereafter, the accused started abusing, stating that they will not allow the complainant’s fam











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top