SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 462

HEMANT GUPTA, SNEH PRASHAR
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate, U. T. Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mr. Jagdish Rai, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Hemant Gupta, J.: (Oral) - The challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is to an order passed by the Single Bench of this Court on 22.9.2015 wherein challenge to an order passed by the District Magistrate on 6.8.2015 remained unsuccessful.

2. The appellants are son and daughter-in-law of Bimla, who have invoked the jurisdiction of the District Magistrate under the provisions of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 claiming shifting of the appellants to their place of residence and be restrained from staying and operating from House No.1719, Nirwana Society, Sector 49-B, Chandigarh. The petition was allowed by the learned District Magistrate. The appellants filed a writ petition challenging the order passed by the Learned District Magistrate before this Court, which has since been dismissed.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants has raised two-fold arguments. Firstly that the order of District Magistrate violated the principles of natural justice as the order of eviction was passed on the very first date of hearing without giving any opportunity to the appellants to rebut the claim of Bimla, the mother of the appellant No.1 and mother-in






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top