SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 1621

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, MAHAVIR S.CHAUHAN
Davinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kulwinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. HPS Ghuman, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Mahavir S. Chauhan, J.: - Kulwinder Kaur, respondent herein, (petitioner before the trial Court) was married to the appellant (respondent before the trial Court), on 04.02.1995 at Village Raisal, Tehsil Nabha, District Patiala according to the Anad Karj ceremony. The marriage was duly consumated, and out of the said wedlock, one daughter, namely, Gagandeep Kaur, and one son, namely, Navjot Singh, who are now aged 13 and 15 years, respectively, were born. Both the children are being taken care of by the respondent. The respondent approached the court of Additional District Judge, Patiala, by way of HMA Case No.23-T of 28.02.2011/ 16.7.2012 for dissolution of her marriage with the appellant by a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty.

2. Appellant appeared before the learned trial Court and filed a written statement denying the allegations mentioned in the petition.

3. After framing of issues, parties were called upon to lead evidence in support of their respective pleas, whereupon respondent examined herself as PW-1, but the appellant could not lead evidence as his defence was struck off for non-payment of the maintenance fixed by the trial Court.

4. After hearing b








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top