SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1848

L.N.MITTAL
Piara Singh – Appellant
Versus
Baldev Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. P. S. Sikand, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. L.N. Mittal, J.: (Oral) - This is second appeal by plaintiff-Piara Singh who was successful in the trial court but has been non-suited by the lower appellate Court.

2. Suit land measuring 4 kanals out of 11 kanals comprised of khasra Nos.405/1(3-0) and 406 (8-0) was sold by defendants No.1 and 2 (proforma respondents No.2 and 3) (since given up in the trial Court) to Baldev Singh-defendant No.3/respondent No.1 vide registered sale deed dated 24.05.2002 for consideration of Rs. 1,25,000/-. Plaintiff filed preemption suit to preempt the said sale on the ground that he is in cultivating possession of the entire 11 kanals land including 4 kanals suit land as tenant on 1/3 batai since long.

3. Defendant No.3 vendee contested the suit and denied the tenancy of the plaintiff and claimed to be owner in possession of the suit land.

4. Learned trial Court decreed the plaintiff’s suit for preemption, but in first appeal preferred by defendant No.3 vendee, lower appellate Court has dismissed the suit of the plaintiff who has, therefore, filed this second appeal.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file including files of the Courts below.

6. Counse


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top