ANITA CHAUDHRY
Rakesh Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Mrs. Anita Chaudhry, J.: - This revision is directed against the order dated 07.10.2015, passed by the SDJM, Samalkha in FIR No.68 dated 07.03.2008.
2. The background is necessary. An application had been filed by the accused to examine the author of Mark DW4/A to DW4/H. The petitioner claims that CCTV camera had been installed at Jain Sathanak, 50, Sector 14, Urban Estate, Karnal and the memory card of the mobile phone for the audio recording is under the control and custody of one Lovely Arora. He had prepared CDs by taking the storage from the CCTV camera through a pen drive and which was transferred to a laptop and it was was in his possession. It was pleaded that DW4 - Sadhvi Jain Ananta had appeared as a defence witness and she was in conversation with Ramesh Jain and it was recorded in the audio and video which was placed in the Court file when Sadhvi Jain Ananta was under examination on 15.05.2015. One set of 8 CDs was handed over to the complainant in the Court and the accused had played the audio and video CDs on the computer and laptop. It was pleaded that in order to prove the electronic evidence, they want to examine Lovely Arora who was maintaining and contro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.