DARSHAN SINGH
Chandro – Appellant
Versus
Randeep Maan – Respondent
Mr. Darshan Singh, J.:- The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 11.02.2015 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panipat, whereby the petitioner has been directed to affix the ad valorem court fees on the consideration of Rs.10,00,000/- as mentioned in the impugned gift deed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that no consideration has been passed over by way of the impugned gift deed. He contended that another gift deed of the same date was earlier challenged. The trial Court had directed to affix the ad valorem court fees on the market value of the suit property, but the said order was set aside by this Court in CR No.7379 of 2013 vide order dated 07.04.2015. He contended that as no consideration was mentioned in the impugned gift deed, the petitioner has also not claimed the relief of possession, so no ad valorem court fees was required to be affixed.
3. I have duly considered the aforesaid contentions.
4. In the present suit, the petitioner has challenged the gift deed dated 06.12.2012 bearing Vasika No.5348 executed by her in favour of respondent Randeep Maan with respect to the land measuring 01 Kanal 19 Ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.