Mrs. Anita Chaudhry, J.: - The petitioner assails the order dated 09.03.2015, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon in complaint case no.599-A/2011 dated 31.10.2011 filed under Sections 376, 403, 417 IPC. The petitioner/complainant had filed an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking permission to examine some additional witnesses and re-examine three witnesses. The trial Court had dismissed the application.

2. It would be necessary to first notice the facts. The petitioner claims that she met Aman Nugyal in Mumbai in 2006. Aman was married. Aman was having problems with his wife and he shared it with the petitioner. In 2008 Aman told the petitioner that his wife was approaching the Court and was seeking divorce from him. After a year Aman contacted the petitioner through Facebook and proposed marriage. The petitioner refused and asked him to get divorce first and only then she could consider the proposal. The accused met the petitioner in Delhi in April, 2010 and informed that he was divorced in March, 2010. The accused succeeded in pursuing the petitioner and she agreed for marriage. In May, 2010 the accused disclosed that the divorce proceedings were sti