DARSHAN SINGH
Mitta India Private Limited, Gaziabad – Appellant
Versus
Harpreet Industries, Ludhiana – Respondent
DARSHAN SINGH, J.
1. The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 18.03.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby the application moved by the petitioner-defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as ‘CPC’) for rejection of plaint, has been dismissed.
2. I have heard Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate learned counsel for the petitioner and have carefully gone through the paper book.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the Civil Court at Ludhiana has no territorial jurisdiction. The application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC can be moved at any stage of the suit. He further contended that the learned trial Court has not given any findings that the Civil Court at Ludhiana will have jurisdiction while dismissing the application. Thus, he contended that as the Civil Court at Ludhiana has no territorial jurisdiction so the application has been wrongly dismissed by the learned Trial Court.
4. I have duly considered the aforesaid contentions. I find that the present application has been moved with malafide intention just to delay the proceedings of the case. The issues in this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.