GURMIT RAM, J.

1. The above noted both the appeals have been preferred by appellants Anand, Dharampal @ Malarh and Bhalu against the judgment dated 31.7.2013 and order of sentence dated 3.8.2013 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak in criminal case bearing FIR No.264 dated 28.10.2008 u/Ss 147, 148, 216, 323, 307, 302, 449 read with Section 149, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short – the IPC) and 25/27/30 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Sampla vide which they were held guilty for the offences punishable u/Ss 148, 302, 307, 449 read with Section 149 and 120-B of the IPC and further appellant Anand was also held guilty for the offence punishable u/S 25 of the Arms Act and awarded the sentences as detailed below :

Under Section	R.I. Imprisonment	Fine	In default of payment of fine
148, IPC	One year each	--	--
120-B, IPC.	Life imprisonment each	Rs.5,000/- each.	2 months each
302 read with Section 149, IPC.	Life imprisonment each	Rs.10,000/- each	4 months each
307 read with Section 149,