SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 935

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Hakam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anoop Singla, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J.

Feeling aggrieved against the impugned order dated 3.11.2015 passed by the Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab, (Annexure P-4), whereby orders of Commissioner as well as District Collector, appointing respondent No.4 as Lambardar were upheld, petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned orders.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was a better candidate than respondent No.4, but the respondent authorities have failed to appreciate this material aspect of the matter, while passing their respective impugned orders. Other side unnecessarily raised the issue of alleged involvement of the petitioner in a criminal case, wherein petitioner never faced any criminal trial and all the accused therein had already been acquitted. Petitioner was working as Deed-Writer and it was not difficult for him to be available for the villagers, but the District Collector drawn an adverse inference against the petitioner, while adopting an illegal approach in this regard. He prays for setting aside the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top