T.P.S.MANN, RAMENDRA JAIN
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRM No. 15520 of 2016 :
Allowed as prayed for.
CRM No. 15521 of 2016 :
2. The applicants namely, Naveen, Satyawan and Parveen, who stand convicted under Sections 148, 326/324/323/452/506/109 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for fours years have prayed for suspension of their sentences of imprisonment.
3. As per the custody certificates, produced by the learned State counsel, applicant Satyawan has undergone an actual sentence of two years, four months and twenty two days whereas applicant Parveen has undergone two years, two months and fifteen days. Similarly, as per custody certificate (Annexure A-10) brought on record by learned counsel for the applicants, applicant Naveen has also undergone sentence of two years and nineteen days as on 18.4.2016.
4. Final hearing of the appeal is likely to take a long time. The applicants have been sentenced to undergo term imprisonment. They have already undergone substantial portion of the sentences of imprisonment imposed upon them. Keeping in view the dictum of law as laid down in Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai and others Vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 1999 SC 1859 and Kiran Kumar v. State of M.P., 2002 SCC (Crl.) 1017, this Court is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.