SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 975

REKHA MITTAL
Amit Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Bimla Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Gourav Goel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Rekha Mittal, J.: (Oral) - The present petition lays challenge to order dated 30.01.2016 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ambala, dismissing the application filed by petitioner for permission to file counter claim (Annexure P-5).

2. Counsel for the petitioner contends that Bimla Devi (respondent No.1) has filed a suit for permanent injunction pertaining to a street depicted in the Site Plan appended with the plaint. The petitioner/defendant filed the written statement contesting claim of the respondent/plaintiff. Later, he filed an application for permission to file counter claim and the same has been dis-allowed by the learned trial Court primarily on the ground that application has been filed at a belated stage as the respondent/plaintiff has already closed his evidence and the case is pending for evidence of the defendants. It is vehemently argued that the learned trial Court committed a gross error as it failed to interpret the provisions of Rules 6A to 6C of Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) in right perspective. In support of his contention, he has relied upon judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India “Mahendra Kumar and





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top