SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1262

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Jitender Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shailendra Sharma

JUDGMENT :

Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.

Challenge in the instant writ petition is to the order dated 25.1.2016 (Annexure P-3), passed by the Additional Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Irrigation and Water Resources Department in terms of which a representation preferred by the petitioner seeking his claim for appointment to the post of Canal Guard, has been rejected.

2. The entire case made out by counsel appearing for the petitioner is that 26 posts of Canal Guards were to be filled up in Bhakra Water Services Circle, Kaithal and in the process of selection that had been conducted only nine posts have been filled up from amongst the general category candidates. It has been argued that reservation could not have exceeded the outer limit of 50% and out of 26 number of posts, 13 posts rightfully should have been filled up from amongst the general category candidates, whereas the select list reflects that only 9 posts have been filled up from such category. Counsel contends that as per result declared the petitioner is at Sr. No.3 in the waiting list for general category and in the eventuality of the department filling up 13 posts of Canal Guards from the general category, then the pe













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top