DARSHAN SINGH, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 23.02.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Jalandhar, whereby the application moved by the petitioner/plaintiff for directing respondents No.4 and 5 to give their blood samples and to order DNA testing to determine that respondent No.5-Satpal Chawla is the natural/biological father of respondent No.4, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that in fact respondent No.5-Satpal Chawla is the biological and natural father of respondent No.4-Tanuj. He contended that the present petitioner/plaintiff was not party to the previous suit i.e. Civil Suit No.229 of 2007 and the findings recorded therein are not binding on the rights of the present petitioner/plaintiff. He contended that defendant/respondent No.4-Tanuj had claimed himself to be the son of deceased-Kulwant Rai and had also claimed his service benefits on the basis of his alleged relationship with Kulwant Rai. He contended that in fact respondent No.4-Tanuj is not the natural son of Kulwant Rai. This fact can be determined by DNA testing of the blood samples of respondents No.4 and 5 as re