RAJESH BINDAL, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Laqshya Media Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Rajesh Bindal, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing of the order dated 22.1.2016 (Annexure P-16), passed by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana, demanding advertisement tax amounting to Rs. 41,77,500/-.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner entered into a concession agreement with M/s Ludhiana City Bus Services Ltd. (for short, 'the Company') on 26.5.2008. In terms of the agreement, the petitioner was granted concession to design, build and maintain bus shelters at different places, which were to be transferred to the Company free of charge after expiry of the concession period. The petitioner was given right to display advertisements.
3. It was argued that the petitioner was earlier issued letters dated 5.1.2015, 22.1.2015, 8.4.2015 and 17.8.2015 raising illegal demand of advertisement tax. Those were impugned by filing CWP No. 20050 of 2015. The writ petition was disposed of on 21.9.2015 with a direction to the authorities to decide the legal notice dated 19.8.2015 got served by the petitioner by passing a speaking order. The petitioner was further directed to deposit Rs. 25,00,000/-. The needful w
Heinz India (P) Ltd. v. State of U. P.
Jagannath Baksh Singh v. State of U.P.
K.T. Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala [AIR 1961 SC 552]
Kunnathat Thathunni Moopil Nair etc. v. State of Kerala and another
Rai Ramkrishna v. State of Bihar
State of A. P. v. Nalla Raja Reddy and others
State of Punjab and others v. Bhatinda District Coop. Milk P. Union Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.