SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1846

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, HARI PAL VERMA
Garg Acrylics Ltd. , Jugiana, Ludhiana – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Shekhar Verma

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.

1. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 and 2 to take a decision in terms of the decision taken by the Council of Ministers in the Cabinet Meeting dated 25.2.2016 (Annexure P-4) and to direct respondent No.4 to strictly process the tenders through E-tendering process and as per the guidelines (Annexure P-10) approved by the Government of Punjab. Further, a writ of certiorari has been sought for quashing the communication dated 6.7.2016 issued by respondent No.3.

2. Put shortly, the facts necessary for adjudication of the instant petition as narrated therein may be noticed. The Council of Ministers, Punjab took a decision on 20.5.2015 to invite tenders for the construction and development of Grain Storage Silo Complex on Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DEFOT) for storage of foodgrain on public private partnership. On 20.8.2015, respondent No.3-Punjab State Warehousing Corporation invited tenders, Annexure P-1, for the aforesaid purpose for seven locations, i.e. Machiwara, Banga, Ajnala, Nurmaha



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top