RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J.

The important question of law that falls for consideration of this Court is; whether the petitioner, having been appointed as a Law Officer, i.e. Senior Deputy Advocate General, in the office of Advocate General, Haryana, whose appointment was contractual in nature, was entitled for medical reimbursement or not.

2. Instant writ petition is directed against the impugned order dated 11.07.2012 (Annexure P-6), as well as impugned communications dated 11.07.2014 (Annexure P-5), 29.12.2008 (Annexure P-7) and 05.07.2012 (Annexure P-8), whereby claim of medical reimbursement of the petitioner, submitted on 17.11.2005 vide Annexure P-3, was not at all considered for long nine years and then petitioner was finally informed, vide impugned communication dated 11.07.2014 (Annexure P-5), that he was not found entitled for medical reimbursement.

3. Briefly put, facts of the present case are that the petitioner was appointed as Senior Deputy Advocate General in the office of Advocate General, Haryana vide appointment order dated 02.05.2005 (Annexure P-1). However, terms and conditions of service of the petitioner along with 12 other Law Officers, came to be fixed