SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1327

DARSHAN SINGH
Balwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Gurminder Singh, Mr. R.P.S. Bara

JUDGMENT :

Darshan Singh, J.

The present appeal has been preferred by appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 21.11.2011 passed by learned Additional District Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track Court, Amritsar, vide which the appeal filed by him against the judgment and decree dated 22.07.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Amritsar has been dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the status of the parties is being mentioned as in the original suit.

3. Plaintiff-appellant has filed the suit for declaration that the contract date 18.04.2002 granted by the respondents-defendants for carrying out the mining operation (Excavating sand) out of the area of villages Chaharpur, Bhagupur Bet, Daryamusa, Malikpur, Chak Fateh Khan, Bhindi Saida, Ponga, Mudferpur and Bhindi Aulakh Khurd has become impossible and impracticable due to illegal mining being carried out by mafia and is hit by Doctrine of frustration. As such, the defendants-respondents are not entitled to recover Rs. 27 lacs with interest from the plaintiff. The plaintiff-appellant has also sought the relief of mandatory injunction directing the defendants to return the amount of Rs. 23,05,000/- deposited



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top