SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1451

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Kamal Devgun – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Suvir Sidhu

JUDGMENT :

Amol Rattan Singh, J.

This is the second appeal of the plaintiff who filed a suit seeking specific performance of an agreement entered into by him with the respondent-defendant on 19.02.2005, for the sale of a plot measuring 311 sq. yards, (fully described in the headnote of the judgment of the learned Civil Judge), situated at Dhandran, Tehsil and District Ludhiana.

He further sought permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property in any manner.

2. The case set up by the appellant, as taken from the judgments of the Courts below, was that the defendant being the owner in possession of the aforesaid plot, had agreed to sell it to the appellant for a total sale consideration of Rs. 20,43,270/-, with earnest money of Rs. 4,00,000/- stated to have been paid on the date of the agreement, i.e. 19.02.2005. The date fixed for executing the sale deed was 15.05.2005 and in between, on 28.02.2005, another sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- is stated to have been paid to the respondent-defendant by the appellant.

15.05.2005 being a Sunday, the appellant asked the respondent to come to the office of the Sub-Registrar, Ludhiana, on 16.05.2005 but allegedly she did not















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top