SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2067

DARSHAN SINGH
Kuldeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Pyari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. P.K. Hooda

JUDGMENT :

Darshan Singh, J.

The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 09.12.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hisar, vide which the appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 05.10.2011 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Hisar, has been dismissed.

2. Appellant-plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration to the effect that he is absolute owner in possession of the house constructed over the plot measuring 0 Kanal 6 Marlas comprised in Khasra no. 67//13/1/2(5-12) i.e. 6/112 share situated at Adampur, Tehsil Adampur, District Hisar on the basis of agreement to sell dated 15.12.2003.

3. As per averments in the plaint, defendants no. 1 to 9 were the owners in possession of the aforesaid plot. They entered into an agreement to sell dated 15.12.2003 in favour of the plaintiff for the sale of the aforesaid plot for a sale consideration one lac. The whole of the sale consideration was paid by the plaintiff on the same day in the presence of the witnesses. The entire terms and conditions were enshrined in the agreement to sell dated 15.12.2003. Defendants have agreed to get the sa































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top