SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1177

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Mukteshwar Nath – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate.
Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

Daya Chaudhary, J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing impugned order dated 10.7.2013 (Annexure P-38) passed by respondent No. 2, vide which, the revision petition filed by the petitioner against orders dated 17.1.1994 (Annexure P-24), 18.1.1994 (Annexure P- 25), 19.1.1994 (Annexure P-26), 18.6.1994 (Annexure P-27) and 21.6.1994 (Annexure P-28) has been dismissed. A further prayer has also been made for quashing of order dated 13.3.1992, whereby, the petitioner has been held guilty for not writing the case diary in five cases (Annnexures P-19 to P-23) and was imposed punishment of forfeiture of his approved service of one year each in five cases and further to grant all service benefits of five years forfeited by respondent No.4 vide aforesaid order along with all consequential benefits.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Constable and thereafter was promoted as ASI and SI. During formal inspection of Police Station City Kotkapura conducted by DSP (D), Faridkot, it was found that the petitioner was entr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top