Rajiv Narain Raina, J.

1. An advertisement for filling up the posts of Primary Teachers (Group C) was published in the year 2012 inviting applications from eligible candidates. The result of the selection was declared on 15.08.2014. The present writ petition has been filed in October, 2016 with the prayer that a direction be issued to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on merit. She admits that she appeared in the interview and produced her testimonials to the Interview Committee, but there is no proof regarding such presentation and this has become a disputed fact. The information supplied to the petitioner under the Right to Information Act, 2005 will not come in aid to the petitioner to overcome delay and laches in a direct recruitment process where every minute and day matters when third parties are settling down every day during the process of conclusion of selection, appointment and permitting joining on the advertised vacancies and posts. No credit worthy evidence is noticeable on record of this case showing that soon after the result was declared, the petitioner took prompt steps to ask the authorities in writing as to why she had not been selected and so ma