SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1202

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJESH BINDAL & HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, JJ.
Garg Inox Limited – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and Others – Respondents
CWP No. 20638 of 2015 (O&M)
Decided On : 02-08-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Vijay K. Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amardeep Sheoran, Mr. Rose Gupta, Mr. Himanshu Chauhan for Mr. Sandeep Singh, Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, Mr. Abhinav Sood for Mr. Vikram Singh, Mr. Abhivadya Sood for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Prashant Gupta for Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Mr. Hardeep Singh Dhillon for Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Mr. Ravindra Jain and Mr. Ashish Chaudhary, Advocates.
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for HERC, Panchkula.
Mr. Raheel Kohli and Mr. Varun Pathak, Advocates for UHBVNL.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the demand of security deposit in cash was in line with the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the Regulations framed thereunder, and the Regulations provided for payment of interest on the security deposit, which safeguarded the interest of the consumers.

Headnote:

Electricity Regulations - Demand of Security Deposit - Sections 47, 61(c) and (d), 181(2)(v)(w) and (zd) of the Act - The court upheld the demand of security deposit in cash as per the Regulations framed under the Electricity Act, 2003. The Regulations were found to be in line with the provisions of the Act, and the court dismissed the petitions challenging the vires of the Regulations.

Fact of the Case:

The petitions challenged the vires of clause 5 of the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (Duty to supply electricity on request, Power to recover expenditure incurred in providing supply & Power to require security) Regulations, 2005, as it demanded a large security deposit in cash from a public limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing stainless steel wires and bars.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the demand of security deposit in cash was in line with the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the Regulations framed thereunder. The court also noted that the Regulations provided for payment of interest on the security deposit, which safeguarded the interest of the consumers.

Issues: The main issue was whether the demand of security deposit in cash was reasonable and in accordance with the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the demand of security deposit in cash was in line with the provisions of the Act, and the Regulations were not beyond the powers conferred under the Act. The court also noted that the Regulations provided for payment of interest on the security deposit, which ensured the safeguarding of consumers' interest.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions challenging the vires of the Regulations, upholding the demand of security deposit in cash as per the Regulations framed under the Electricity Act, 2003.

JUDGMENT :

Rajesh Bindal, J.

1. This order will dispose of a bunch of petitions, as detailed below:-

S. No.

CWP No.

Parties Name

1.

20638 of 2015

Garg Inox Limited v. State of Haryana & others

2.

21869 of 2015

Surya Roshni Limited v. State of Haryana & others

3.

22230 of 2015

Garg Aluminio Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

4.

22246 of 2015

Somany Ceramics Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

5.

23609 of 2015

Rajesh Industries v. State of Haryana & others

6.

23610 of 2015

Tanna Agro Implex Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

7.

23611 of 2015

M/s. Bhartiya Cottex v. State of Haryana & others

8.

23612 of 2015

M/s. Kamla Rice Mill v. State of Haryana & others

9.

23613 of 2015

M/s Jai Hanumaan Rice and General Mills v. State of Haryana and others

10.

23614 of 2015

Veer Oil and General Mills v. State of Haryana & others

11.

23615 of 2015

Aroma Agrotech v. State of Haryana & others

12.

23616 of 2015

M/s. Shiv Shakti Rice Mill v. State of Haryana & others

13.

23617 of 2015

Sunrise Rice Land Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

14.

23618 of 2015

M/s. Bansal Rice and General Mills v. State of Haryana & others

15.

23619 of 2015

M/s. Bansal Rice and General Mills v. State of Haryana & others

16.

23620 of 2015

Shree Jagdamba Agrico Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

17.

23621 of 2015

M/s. Mahavir Agro Foods v. State of Haryana & others

18.

23622 of 2015

M/s. Bhartiya Cottex v. State of Haryana & others

19.

23623 of 2015

Aakash Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

20.

23624 of 2015

Aroma Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

21.

23801 of 2015

Veer Overseas Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

22.

23851 of 2015

Lord Krishna Rice Mills v. State of Haryana & others

23.

23854 of 2015

M/s. Om Rice & General Mills v. State of Haryana & others

24.

24242 of 2015

Aggarwal Food and others v. State of Haryana & others

25.

24243 of 2015

Nav Jyoti Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd. and others v. State of Haryana and others

26.

24244 of 2015

Garg International and others v. State of Haryana & others

27.

24245 of 2015

Ganesh Rice Mills and others v. State of Haryana & others

28.

24466 of 2015

Shri Krishna Overseas and others v. State of Haryana & others

29.

24690 of 2015

M/s Shree Krishan Kripa Feeds v. State of Haryana & others

30.

25084 of 2015

Royal Star Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

31.

25220 of 2015

Keshav Export v. State of Haryana and others

32.

25277 of 2015

Bag Poly International Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

33.

25296 of 2015

Ghanshyam Brothers v. State of Haryana and others

34.

26024 of 2015

Gaba Overseas (P) Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

35.

26061 of 2015

R.D. Industries and others v. State of Haryana & others

36.

26262 of 2015

Mahabir Industries and others v. State of Haryana & others

37.

26265 of 2015

D.D. International v. State of Haryana & others

38.

26632 of 2015

Green Village Agros (P) Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

39.

27082 of 2015

K.S. Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

40.

100 of 2016

Gagan Rice Mills and others v. State of Haryana and others

41.

294 of 2016

Bag Poly International Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana & others

42.

711 of 2016

Singla Rice Agro Industries v. State of Haryana & others

43.

1222 of 2016

M/s. Venus Cottex v. State of Haryana & others

44.

1238 of 2016

M/s. Venus Cottex v. State of Haryana & others

45.

1242 of 2016

Riviera Home Furnishings Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana and others

46.

1574 of 2016

Sachdeva Textiles v. State of Haryana















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top