SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1712

DARSHAN SINGH
Kimti Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr.Rohan Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

DARSHAN SINGH, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Samana, vide which the application moved by the petitioner-plaintiff for framing the additional issues has been dismissed.

2. Plaintiff-petitioner has filed the suit for declaration to the effect that the registered sale deed dated 24.12.1996 executed by respondent-defendant no.1 in favour of respondent-defendant no.2 with respect to the land measuring 14 Kanal 15 Marlas situated in the revenue estate of village Nial, Tehsil Patran, District Patiala and the mutation no. 2191 sanctioned in favour of defendant no.2 are illegal, null and void, without consideration and not binding on the rights of the plaintiff. The same is result of collusion and fraud and are liable to be set aside. He has also sought the relief of possession of the said land as well as the decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the suit property.

3. The said suit has been contested by the defendants-respondents on the grounds inter alia that defendant no.1 being the attorney of the plaintiff has executed the sale deed dated
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top