DARSHAN SINGH
Kimti Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar – Respondent
DARSHAN SINGH, J.
The present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Samana, vide which the application moved by the petitioner-plaintiff for framing the additional issues has been dismissed.
2. Plaintiff-petitioner has filed the suit for declaration to the effect that the registered sale deed dated 24.12.1996 executed by respondent-defendant no.1 in favour of respondent-defendant no.2 with respect to the land measuring 14 Kanal 15 Marlas situated in the revenue estate of village Nial, Tehsil Patran, District Patiala and the mutation no. 2191 sanctioned in favour of defendant no.2 are illegal, null and void, without consideration and not binding on the rights of the plaintiff. The same is result of collusion and fraud and are liable to be set aside. He has also sought the relief of possession of the said land as well as the decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the suit property.
3. The said suit has been contested by the defendants-respondents on the grounds inter alia that defendant no.1 being the attorney of the plaintiff has executed the sale deed dated
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.