SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1657

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Hoshiyar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.

1. The petitioners herein serving as Clerks in the department of Horticulture, State of Haryana, are aggrieved of the order dated 28.12.2015 (Annexure P-5) in terms of which their claim for release of annual increments by giving them relaxation from passing the type test, has been declined.

2. Brief facts that would require notice are that petitioner No.1 joined as Beldar in the year 1981 on adhoc basis and his services were regularized w.e.f 17.01.1982. Petitioner No.2 joined the respondent department in the year 1981 on the post of Mali on adhoc basis and he was granted the benefit of regularization w.e.f 03.03.1982. On 05.06.2014, a letter was circulated by the Director General, Horticulture, Haryana, on the subject of promotion of Class-IV employees to the post of Clerk. Both the petitioners applied for promotion and were promoted to the post of Clerk vide order dated 29.08.2014 (Annexure P-3).

3. Learned counsel would vehemently argue that even though the condition for qualifying the test had been imposed in the promotion order itself, yet they are entitled to the grant of annual increments as at this advance stage of 52/54 years of age, it wo









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top